Skip to content
PaperFren

Small icebergs add a lot of Greenland fjord freshwater

Open paper intelligence

High-resolution UNet mapping finds far more small icebergs than Sentinel-2 thresholding, raising Sermilik meltwater estimates toward ~2000 m³ s−1.

Source

Significant contribution of small icebergs to the freshwater budget in Greenland fjords

Rezvanbehbahani S, Stearns LA, Keramati R, et al. · Communications earth & environment · 2020

doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00032-3Read the full paper ↗2 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — UNet mapping of icebergs in Planet imagery vs Sentinel-2 thresholding in Greenland fjords
N
N=10000 · ~10,000 manual iceberg labels used to train the UNet
Population
Icebergs in Sermilik and Kangerlussuaq fjords, East Greenland
Outcome
Higher small-iceberg area and meltwater discharge estimates (~1300–2000 m³ s−1 Sermilik)

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

Authors trained a UNet on ~10,000 manual iceberg labels in ~3 m Planet imagery of Sermilik and Kangerlussuaq fjords, compared with same-day Sentinel-2 TOA thresholding, fit size distributions, and converted area to meltwater with empirical keel/width relations.

What they found

P-UNet mapped 60.4 km² of icebergs in Sermilik, ~50% more than S-TOA, with ~5× more small bergs. Size distributions follow a power law only above ~300 m². Sermilik discharge is ~1310 m³ s−1 along-fjord and ~2020 m³ s−1 in a June–July comparison, exceeding some prior melt estimates; small bergs melt near the surface.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Two fjords and a few summer images do not give an annual cycle. Melt rates ignore fjord stratification and deep keels. Power-law extrapolation of small-berg contribution year-round is an assumption.

Key terms

P-UNet
UNet convolutional network trained on Planet imagery to segment icebergs.
S-TOA
Sentinel-2 near-infrared reflectance threshold used to pick icebergs.
Power-law size distribution
Fractal iceberg area-frequency relation that fails below ~300 m².
Keel depth
Submerged iceberg thickness estimated from surface length.
Subglacial discharge
Meltwater exiting at the glacier grounding line, compared here with iceberg melt.

Flashcards

1 / 11

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

P-UNet Sermilik iceberg area is about:

Common questions

Why miss small icebergs in 10 m imagery?

They occupy few pixels and are too dark for simple reflectance thresholds.

Do small bergs change freshwater location?

They melt near the surface, unlike deep-keeled large bergs.

Is iceberg melt bigger than subglacial discharge?

On an annual scale in Sermilik, net iceberg freshwater exceeds subglacial discharge.

What size breaks the power law?

About 300 m².

More on Ice sheets