Skip to content
PaperFren

Social media profiles in learning ecologies

Open paper intelligence

Communications students at an online university formed distinct social-media learning profiles, including more academically guided versus more informal/digital resource users.

Source

Social media in the learning ecologies of communications students: Identifying profiles from students' perspective

Bruguera C, Guitert M, Romeu T · Education and information technologies · 2022

doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11169-3Read the full paper ↗6 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Survey of communications students’ social-media learning ecologies
N
N=564 · From a population of 2,522 students
Population
Communications students
Outcome
How students use social media within their learning ecologies

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Social media profiles in learning ecologies

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

564 students responded from a population of 2522.

the total population of students was 2522, the final sample, or respondents, were 564 students

One cluster was about 19% of the sample with high academically guided resource scores.

The second cluster represents 19% of the total sample and is characterized by significantly high scores on variables in place with academically guided learning resources
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Researchers surveyed 564 UOC communications students about social media in their learning ecologies, ran PCA on dozens of items, then clustered respondents into learner profiles.

What they found

Factor/cluster solutions distinguished students who rely more on academically guided resources from those oriented to informal digital resources and actions, informing more flexible, profile-based training.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Cross-sectional self-reports cannot prove that matching instruction to profiles improves learning outcomes, and the sample is one online communications program.

Key terms

Learning ecologies
The set of contexts, resources, and activities through which people learn across formal and informal settings.
Social media
Platforms students use for communication, content, and networking that can support learning.
Principal component analysis (PCA)
Technique reducing many survey items into interpretable factors.
Learner profiles
Clusters of students with similar patterns of social-media learning use.
Academically guided resources
Learning supports shaped by formal academic structures and guidance.
Informal digital resources
Self-directed digital tools and practices outside tightly teacher-directed pathways.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

What was the analytic goal?

Common questions

Who was surveyed?

564 communications students at UOC (from a population of about 2,522).

What analytic steps were used?

PCA followed by cluster analysis of social-media learning items.

What kinds of profiles emerged?

Profiles differing in academically guided versus more informal/digital resource orientations.

What is the practical aim?

Support more flexible, personalized, collaborative training based on learner profiles.

More on Collaborative learning