Skip to content
PaperFren

2012 Colorado wildfire PM raised asthma visits

Open paper intelligence

During a 32-day 2012 fire period, modeled PM2.5 associated with asthma/wheeze and COPD ED visits; cardiovascular associations were largely null.

Source

The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study

Alman BL, Pfister G, Hao H, et al. · Environmental health : a global access science source · 2016

doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0146-8Read the full paper ↗122 citationscc by

Inspect source passages

2012 Colorado wildfire PM raised asthma visits

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Analyses spanned 32 observations per stratum from June 5 to July 6, 2012.

The analyses spanned from June 5, 2012 to July 6, 2012, thus resulting in 32 observations per stratum.

Were cardiovascular associations consistent?

Overall, the cardiovascular disease effect estimates in our study were fairly consistent with no association although some confidence intervals were wide.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

A grid-stratified case-crossover linked 1-h max and 24-h mean PM2.5 (fire-smoke model) to Colorado ED/hospitalization codes from 5 June–6 July 2012, controlling day-of-week and temperature.

What they found

Asthma/wheeze 24-h mean OR 1.04 per 5 μg/m³; COPD OR 1.05 per 5 μg/m³. 1-h max ORs were 1.01 per 10 μg/m³. Cardiovascular estimates were consistent with no association; model absolute bias was ~13 μg/m³ in Denver.

The limits

What it doesn't show

One fire season and wide CVD confidence intervals (low case counts) cannot rule out cardiovascular effects; exposure model bias was large near fires.

Key terms

Wildfire PM2.5
Fine particles in smoke plumes, here modeled on a 12 km grid.
Case-crossover
Each grid is its own control across days, controlling time-invariant place factors.
1-h max vs 24-h mean
Peak hourly versus daily-average PM2.5 metrics.
COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ED diagnoses.
Absolute bias
Mean absolute difference between modeled and monitor PM2.5.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Wildfire PM2.5 was positively associated with:

Common questions

Which outcomes rose with PM2.5?

Asthma/wheeze and COPD.

CVD?

Fairly consistent with no association.

Study window?

5 June–6 July 2012 (32 days).

24-h asthma OR?

1.04 per 5 μg/m³.

More on Particulate matter