Skip to content
PaperFren

Soft polymers wet UiO-66 without interfacial voids

Open paper intelligence

MD shows flexible PVDF and PEG fill UiO-66 surface pockets; rigid PIM-1 and PS leave microvoids and fail as 70 wt% films.

Source

Understanding the origins of metal-organic framework/polymer compatibility

Semino R, Moreton JC, Ramsahye NA, et al. · Chemical science · 2018

doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04152gRead the full paper ↗81 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — MD of polymer interfaces on a hydrated UiO-66 slab plus 70–80 wt% mixed-matrix films
N
PIM-1, PS, PVDF, and PEG against {101} UiO-66; experimental films at high filler loading
Population
MOF/polymer mixed-matrix membrane interfaces
Outcome
Flexible PVDF and PEG fill UiO-66 surface pockets; rigid PIM-1 and PS leave microvoids and fail as high-loading films

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Soft polymers wet UiO-66 without interfacial voids

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

The MOF powder has a BET area of 1380 ± 60 m2 g–1.

yielding 200 nm truncated octahedral particles (Fig. S17) with the expected powder X-ray diffraction pattern (Fig. S18) and a BET area of 1380 ± 60 m 2 g –1 (Table S7, Fig. S19).

z-length A is 15 ± 3 Å for the PIM-1 composite versus 6 ± 1 Å for PVDF.

the affinity of UiO-66 for PVDF (6 ± 1 Å) is higher when compared to PIM-1 (15 ± 3 Å) and PS (9 ± 2 Å), respectively.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Authors built a hydrated {101} UiO-66 slab, equilibrated PIM-1, PS, PVDF and PEG against it, and made 70–80 wt% PEG MMMs compared with PVDF, PS and PIM-1 films.

What they found

PIM-1/PS interfaces have microvoids (up to 13 Å and 8 Å) and long recovery distances (z-length A 15 and 9 Å). PVDF and PEG show no voids, chain-end pore penetration, and H-bonds at 2.0 vs 1.7 Å. PEG Young's modulus more than doubles at 70 wt% MOF, but N2 area collapses; PVDF keeps MOF porosity.

The limits

What it doesn't show

No gas-separation permeance on the new PEG MMMs; PEG pore blocking is inferred from BET, not in situ pore tomography; only one MOF topology was modelled.

Key terms

Mixed-matrix membrane (MMM)
Polymer film filled with MOF particles to combine processability and selectivity.
z-length A
Distance from the MOF surface until polymer density recovers its bulk oscillation.
λs
Polymer density in the overlap region divided by bulk polymer density.
UiO-66
Zirconium terephthalate MOF used here as a 200 nm filler.
PIM-1
Polymer of intrinsic microporosity; rigid, poorly packing chains.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

UiO-66 surface cut used in MD:

Common questions

Which polymers are compatible at 70 wt%?

PVDF and PEG form handleable films; PS and PIM-1 crack.

What molecular feature marks compatibility?

No interfacial microvoids and polymer ends in surface pores.

Why does PEG lose BET area?

Stronger OPEG···HOUiO-66 H-bonds compact the interface and block pores.

What Young's modulus cutoff is proposed?

Polymers below ~1 GPa wet the MOF surface.

More on Polymers