Skip to content
PaperFren

Hydrology

350,000 years of Great Basin groundwater recharge

Jackson TR, Steidle SD, Wendt KA, et al. · Communications earth & environment · 2023

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Devils Hole water-table history plus a groundwater model shows glacial recharge more than doubled modern rates while interglacial drying cut them only modestly.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsHydrologyconcept

    Devils Hole water-table history plus a groundwater model shows glacial recharge more than doubled modern rates while interglacial drying cut them only modestly.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — Groundwater-flow model inverted against uranium-series Devils Hole paleo-water-table elevations
N
Three glacial–interglacial cycles; peak glacial water tables at least +9.5 m
Population
Southern Great Basin groundwater recharge history
Outcome
Glacial recharge more than doubled modern rates while peak interglacial drying cut them only modestly

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

350,000 years of Great Basin groundwater recharge

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Which recharge map better fits dry climates?

Results indicate that a scaled-recharge approach better simulates drier periods, compared to the uniform-recharge approach.

Why is a millennial perspective needed here?

This is because large groundwater basins have long (>1000-year) equilibration timescales between time-varying recharge and groundwater-level changes .
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Peak glacial water tables at least +9.5 m imply recharge increases of at least 233–244% versus modern. Peak interglacial levels above −1.6 m imply at most a 17% (scaled) recharge drop. Water-table change per percent recharge is much larger in dry climates than wet ones.

Methodology

Authors inverted a modified groundwater-flow model against uranium-series Devils Hole paleo-water-table elevations, testing scaled versus uniform recharge maps over three glacial–interglacial cycles.

Limitations

Transmissivity, topography, and strain are assumed nearly constant; the exact glacial water-table maximum is unknown, so wet-period recharge is a lower bound.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.