Skip to content
PaperFren

Health equity

Did China’s two-child policy change birth defects?

Zhang X, Chen L, Wang X, et al. · PLoS medicine · 2020

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

In 1.26 million Zhejiang births, advanced maternal age nearly doubled after the two-child policy and total birth-defect prevalence rose, especially chromosomal anomalies.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Serial hospital-based birth-defect surveillance comparing one-child, partial two-child, and universal two-child policy periods in Zhejiang
N
N=1260684 · 1,260,684 births (live births, early fetal losses, stillbirths, early neonatal deaths) across 2009–2017 surveillance years
Population
Births captured by Zhejiang Province BD surveillance covering 90 hospitals (about one-third of provincial births)
Outcome
Maternal age distribution, prevalence and ranking of birth defects, prenatal diagnosis timing, and live-birth rate of BDs before 28 weeks

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Births to mothers ≥35 rose 85.68% (8.52% in 2013 to 15.82% in 2017). BD prevalence rose from 245.95 to 304.36 per 10,000 births. Trisomy 21 crude OR was 2.13; other chromosomal defects OR 3.63. Live birth of BDs before 28 weeks rose from 1.29% to 11.45%.

Methodology

Compared BD surveillance years representing the one-child (2013), partial two-child (2015), and universal two-child (2017) periods, using 90 hospitals covering about one-third of Zhejiang births, and also showed pre-policy age trends (2009, 2011).

Limitations

Observational surveillance cannot prove the policy caused defects; unknown confounders and changing prenatal detection may contribute.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.