Skip to content
PaperFren

Health equity

Discrimination in care for homeless adults

Skosireva A, O'Campo P, Zerger S, et al. · BMC health services research · 2014

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Among homeless adults with mental illness, perceived healthcare discrimination—especially for mental illness/poverty—linked to worse symptoms and more ED use.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Baseline analysis from Toronto At Home/Chez Soi Housing First trial sample
N
N=550 · Final analytic sample with baseline interviews
Population
Homeless adults with mental illness at the Toronto At Home/Chez Soi site
Outcome
Past-year perceived discrimination in healthcare and associations with ED use

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

42% reported any discrimination; mental illness/substance use (33%) and homelessness/poverty (30%) were most common; discrimination associated with greater lifetime substance/mental severity and more frequent ED use.

Methodology

Using Toronto At Home/Chez Soi baseline data, researchers measured past-year perceived discrimination in healthcare and associations with mental health, substance use, and emergency department use.

Limitations

Causal direction (discrimination vs illness severity) and whether anti-discrimination interventions reduce ED use.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsHealth Equityconcept

    Multiple studies in this library examine health equity with empirical patient or population outcomes rather than opinion alone.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsHealth Equityconcept

    42% reported any discrimination; mental illness/substance use (33%) and homelessness/poverty (30%) were most common; discrimination associated with greater lifetime substance/mental severity and more frequent ED use.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsHealth Equityconcept

    Effect sizes and settings differ across health equity studies — digital vs clinic, trial vs observational — so results should not be pooled casually.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.