Stroke & recovery
Does motor-imagery-contingent BCI feedback help chronic stroke?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
In 25 people with chronic stroke, 4 weeks of BCI-FES with MI-contingent feedback improved wrist extensor strength more than matched MI-independent (sham-like) feedback.
Study at a glance
- Design
- RCT — Double-blinded, parallel-group RCT; 1:1 MI-contingent vs MI-independent BCI-FES; assessors and participants blinded.
- N
- N=25 · 27 chronic-stroke participants enrolled; 2 dropouts; 12 contingent vs 13 independent analyzed.
- Population
- Adults with first-ever chronic hemiplegic stroke (≥6 months), wrist extensor MRC ≤2.
- Outcome
- MRC-WE and AROM-WE plus resting-state EEG connectivity after 20 sessions over 4 weeks.
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
MRC-WE improved more with contingent feedback (adjusted mean difference 0.52, 95% CI 0.03–1.00, p=0.036). Within contingent, AROM-WE rose by week 4 (p=0.019). Affected-hemisphere connectivity increased and correlated with MRC-WE and FMA-distal. FMA-total did not favor contingent.
Methodology
Double-blind RCT at one rehab hospital (2020–2022). recoveriX-PRO delivered 20 × 60-min sessions, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Contingent group got FES/avatar only when EEG detected the correct-hand motor imagery; independent group got three calibration runs with FES regardless of MI.
Limitations
Pilot n=25, single center, no long-term follow-up after W4; FMA-total was not superior, so gains are mainly wrist-level and may not generalize to all upper-limb function or acute stroke.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.