Skip to content
PaperFren

Development

How kids' emotional understanding affects school success

Franco MDG, Beja MJ, Candeias A, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2017

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

While emotional understanding does not directly improve children's school grades, it helps them build better social skills, which directly lead to higher academic success.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — SEM of emotion understanding, social competence, and grades in Madeira primary schools
N
N=406 · Teacher ratings for 108 and parent ratings for 86 of the 406 students
Population
Primary-school students aged 6–11 in Madeira, Portugal
Outcome
School achievement mediated by social competence from emotion understanding

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

The final statistical model successfully explained 52.6% of the variance in children's school grades. Emotional understanding had no direct impact on grades; instead, its influence was fully mediated by social competence, meaning emotional skills improved social behaviors, which then boosted grades. Social competence was the strongest overall predictor of grades, followed by fluid intelligence and the mother's educational level, with no differences observed between boys and girls.

Methodology

The researchers measured fluid intelligence, emotion understanding, and social competence in 406 primary school students aged 6 to 11 in Madeira, Portugal. They gathered social skill ratings from a subset of 108 teachers and 86 parents, and tracked children's final school grades in Portuguese and Mathematics. Using structural equation modeling, the authors analyzed whether social competence mediated the link between emotional understanding and school grades.

Limitations

Because the study design is cross-sectional and correlational, it cannot prove that emotional or social competence directly cause better grades, only that they are associated. Additionally, academic achievement was measured solely through teacher-assigned grades, which can be subjective and vary across classrooms. Finally, the study did not measure or control for other potentially important variables, such as children's personality traits or the quality of their relationships with their teachers.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsFluid Intelligenceconcept

    Fluid intelligence directly predicts academic performance in primary school children, though social-emotional skills like social competence can have an even stronger overall influence on school grades.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsFluid Intelligenceconcept

    There is an apparent tension regarding the predictive strength of fluid intelligence on school performance: visual fluid intelligence is a weaker predictor of grades than verbal reasoning in older secondary school science students, whereas general fluid intelligence is a direct and highly robust predictor of grades in primary school children.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    There is an apparent tension regarding the predictive strength of fluid intelligence on school performance: visual fluid intelligence is a weaker predictor of grades than verbal reasoning in older secondary school science students, whereas general fluid intelligence is a direct and highly robust predictor of grades in primary school children.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.