Long-term memory
What about juggling words briefly helps us remember them later?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Words were remembered better later mainly when they had enjoyed more spare time in working memory, while making the distracting task harder or longer had no consistent long-term effect.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Human experiment — Six within-subject complex-span experiments varying distractor cognitive load, number of distractors and/or free time, each followed by a delayed free-recall test; Bayesian analyses
- N
- N=144 · 24 participants in each of six separate experiments (one block missing for one participant in Experiment 5)
- Population
- University subject-pool participants tested in Fribourg (Italian words) and Essex (English words)
- Outcome
- Delayed free recall of words, overall and conditionalized on correct immediate serial recall; immediate recall and distractor response times as manipulation checks
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Harder or faster distractors reliably hurt immediate recall in the first four experiments, but their effect on delayed recall was absent or ambiguous once differences in immediate recall were taken into account. The number of distractors mostly had no effect, apart from a benefit on conditionalized delayed recall in Experiment 4, which used stronger suppression of rehearsal. The best predictor of delayed recall was the free time a word had accumulated, which followed a logarithmic curve: extra time helped a lot early on and less as time built up. Surprisingly, directly manipulating free time in Experiments 5 and 6 did not produce a clear effect.
Methodology
Across six experiments, 24 people per experiment saw lists of four words, each followed by a series of simple digit or location judgements (distractors), and then recalled the words in order straight away. After each block and a short filler task, they tried to recall all the words from that block in any order. The experiments varied how demanding the distractors were (a harder task or a faster pace), how many distractors followed each word, and how much free time followed each distractor. The authors also estimated how much free time each word had accumulated and related this to delayed recall.
Limitations
The free-time relationship is correlational: accumulated free time was estimated after the fact from response times, and when free time was manipulated directly it produced no clear effect, so the study cannot say free time causes better long-term memory. The three factors cannot be varied fully independently, because changing load or number of distractors automatically changes free time. Each experiment had only 24 participants, the experiments differed in language, rehearsal suppression and distractor counts, and none were pre-registered. The paper is a short report, so detailed statistics for each experiment are in figures and supplements rather than the text.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.