Skip to content
PaperFren

Treatment adherence

Does early, guideline-true physical therapy cut back-pain costs?

Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, et al. · BMC health services research · 2015

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Among 753,450 MHS adults with new LBP, early guideline-adherent PT (17,175 people) tracked less imaging, injections, surgery, and opioids and about 60% lower 2-year LBP-related costs.

Study at a glance

Design
Cohort — Retrospective Military Health System cohort of new primary-care LBP visits (2007–2009) with 2-year utilization/cost follow-up.
N
N=753450 · 753,450 unique patients 18–60 after exclusions; 122,723 (16.3%) used PT within 90 days; 17,175 early + guideline-adherent.
Population
MHS beneficiaries aged 18–60 with a new primary-care low-back-pain visit (no LBP care in prior 12 months).
Outcome
2-year advanced imaging, lumbar injections, lumbar surgery, opioid use, and LBP-related costs by PT timing and guideline adherence.

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

16.3% used PT. Early vs delayed PT: imaging AOR 0.52, injections 0.56, surgery 0.59, opioids 0.62; LBP costs $1,828 vs $3,031 (about $1,202 lower). Adherent vs non-adherent care also cut imaging/injections/surgery (AORs 0.72–0.85) but not opioids.

Methodology

Identified new primary-care LBP visits 2007–2009, classified PT within 14 days as early (vs 14–90 days delayed), scored PT content as guideline-adherent active care, and compared 2-year utilization (adjusted ORs, 99% CIs) and costs.

Limitations

Observational claims cannot prove PT caused the savings—healthier or more motivated patients may get early adherent PT; RCTs are still needed before policy mandates.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.