Skip to content
PaperFren

Depression treatment

Mediterranean diet and depression risk

Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González MA, Estruch R, et al. · BMC medicine · 2013

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Overall Mediterranean diet assignment did not significantly reduce depression; a nuts arm suggested benefit in diabetes subgroup analyses.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsDepression Treatmentconcept

    224 depression cases (median 5.4 years). Merged MD HR 0.85 (NS). MD-nuts nonsignificantly inverse overall; significant benefit in DM2 subgroup.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • When depression is not the trial's original primary endpoint, a Cox HR below 1 is easy to over-read. PREDIMED's merged Mediterranean-diet HR for incident depression was 0.85 and not significant; a nuts-arm benefit appeared in a diabetes subgroup after 224 cases over a median 5.4 years.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Study at a glance

Design
RCT — PREDIMED Mediterranean-diet arms vs control; incident depression, including a diabetes subgroup
N
N=2513 · Analytic sample reported for the depression analysis
Population
PREDIMED adults at high cardiovascular risk
Outcome
Incident depression after assignment to Mediterranean diet with nuts vs control, especially among participants with type 2 diabetes

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Mediterranean diet and depression risk

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

224 new depression cases.

We identified 224 new cases of depression during the follow-up period (median 5.4 years).

Merged MD HR 0.85.

When both MDs were merged together and analyzed as a single group, no significant association was found between the MD intervention and depression risk (multivariate HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.13). R
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

224 depression cases (median 5.4 years). Merged MD HR 0.85 (NS). MD-nuts nonsignificantly inverse overall; significant benefit in DM2 subgroup.

Methodology

PREDIMED randomised high-CVD-risk adults to MD-EVOO, MD-nuts, or low-fat control and tracked incident depression.

Limitations

Depression was not the original primary endpoint; subgroups can be chance findings.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.