Skip to content
PaperFren

Habitat restoration

Flower-rich, mixed landscapes support more pollinators

Gómez-Martínez C, González-Estévez MA, Cursach J, et al. · Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Across 20 natural communities, wild pollinator abundance rose with local flower richness and landscape heterogeneity, linking land-use homogenization to weaker pollination networks.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

Flower-rich, mixed landscapes support more pollinators

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Authors recorded 9635 pollinator visits on 20 sites.

we recorded 9635 visits of pollinators to flowers: 6983 by beetles (24 families, 78 species), 1136 by wild bees (five families, 67 species), 1276 by flies (33 families, 125 species), 142 by wasps (17 families, 44 species), 98 by butterflies (eight families, 24 species), and 1370 by honeybees.

They used data on 20 natural plant–pollinator communities.

we used data on 20 natural plant–pollinator communities along gradients of landscape heterogeneity and flower richness.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Mean wild pollinator richness was ~48 standardized species per site (40–88 raw). Abundance increased with flower richness and (marginally) landscape heterogeneity at 1 km. Networks and diets also shifted along those resource-diversity gradients.

Methodology

Authors surveyed 20 plant–pollinator communities along gradients of 1 km landscape heterogeneity and local flower richness, recording 9,635 visits and building networks of wild bees, flies, beetles, and other guilds (honeybees present but relatively scarce).

Limitations

Twenty sites in one region cannot prove a global pollinator collapse or a specific restoration recipe, and honeybee effects were limited by low hive abundance.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.