Atmospheric chemistry
Lightning NO fixes upper-air ozone in CMAQ
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Adding lightning nitric oxide to CMAQv5.2 raises underestimated mid/upper-tropospheric ozone and nitrate rain, especially when flashes are timed with observations.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
This library holds 5 empirical papers on atmospheric chemistry with measured outcomes rather than reviews.
Evidence for the claim as stated.
Adding lightning nitric oxide to CMAQv5.2 raises underestimated mid/upper-tropospheric ozone and nitrate rain, especially when flashes are timed with observations.
Evidence for the claim as stated.
A regional ozone study or a mechanism evaluation is not a full global chemical climate model.
Evidence for the claim as stated.
Open questions
Tensions this paper is part of
From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.
A regional ozone study or a mechanism evaluation is not a full global chemical climate model.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Computational / modelling — CMAQv5.2 April–September 2011 runs with and without lightning-NO schemes
- N
- Base plus three LNO schemes on a 12 km CONUS domain; not an observational sample N
- Population
- US atmospheric chemistry (ozone, NOx, nitrate wet deposition) in CMAQv5.2
- Outcome
- Improved mid/upper-tropospheric ozone and nitrate deposition when lightning NO is included
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Inspect source passages
Lightning NO fixes upper-air ozone in CMAQ
These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.
The domain is 299 by 459 cells at 12 km grid spacing.
The model domain consists of 299 north–south grid cells by 459 east–west grid cells utilizing 12 km × 12 km horizontal grid spacing, 35 vertical layers with varying thickness extending from the surface to 50 hPa and an approximately 10 m midpoint for the lowest (surface) model layer.
Simulations cover April to September 2011.
The simulation time period covers the months from April to September 2011 with a 10 d spin-up period in March.
Key findings
Without LNO, mid/upper tropospheric ozone and domain-wide nitrate wet deposition (except the Pacific Coast) are too low. Hourly lightning timing (hNLDN) often best matches surface ozone in the Northeast. Where the Base already overpredicts surface ozone, adding LNO can worsen bias while still raising correlation—other NOx sources remain wrong.
Methodology
Authors ran CMAQv5.2 (CB6, 12 km, April–September 2011) with Base (no LNO) and three lightning-NO schemes (mNLDN, hNLDN, pNLDN), then compared DM8HR ozone, NOx, DISCOVER-AQ P-3B profiles, sondes, and NADP nitrate wet deposition.
Limitations
Schemes inherit WRF convection errors. pNLDN is for forecasts without observed flashes, not a substitute for process truth. One US summer 2011 cannot generalize globally, and vertical LNO placement remains uncertain.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.