Skip to content
PaperFren

Carbon cycle

Arctic food-web carbon is going isotopically light

de la Vega C, Jeffreys RM, Tuerena R, et al. · Global change biology · 2019

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Across 17 Arctic regions, water-column POC δ13C fell 0.149‰ per year—far faster than DIC/CO2 (0.011‰/yr)—and seal and whale tissues tracked the decline.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

Arctic food-web carbon is going isotopically light

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Authors analysed 17 marine Arctic regions.

We analysed the δ 13 C‐POC water , δ 13 C‐POC ice , δ 13 C‐DIC and δ 13 C‐CO 2 values in 17 marine arctic regions (Figure ; Table ).

Did shelves vs basins differ?

POC water from arctic shelves was significantly enriched in 13 C compared to POC water from arctic basins and POC riv
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Shelves were 13C-enriched versus basins; ice POC was often heavier than water POC. Combined-region DIC/CO2 declined 0.011‰/yr (1977–2014) while POC water declined 0.149‰/yr (1986–2013). Mammal δ13C also fell (e.g., ringed seals −0.046‰/yr).

Methodology

Authors compiled marine δ13C of POC (water and ice), DIC, dissolved CO2, and mammal teeth/baleen, then fit spatial ANOVAs and decadal linear trends.

Limitations

Compiled opportunistic samples are summer-biased; diet shifts could contribute to mammal trends, so Suess+ice-loss is not the only possible driver.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.