Face processing
Does hidden racial bias change how well we remember other-race faces?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
More contact with Asian people predicted better memory for Asian faces, and, unexpectedly, strong face recognisers with a more negative implicit bias toward Asians remembered Asian faces best.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Cross-sectional — Correlational individual-differences design: old/new face memory task with eye tracking, IAT, CFMT and experience questionnaires, analysed by multiple regression.
- N
- N=53 · 53 Caucasian undergraduates; eye-movement analyses excluded 7 participants with too many rejected trials.
- Population
- Caucasian undergraduates at NYU Abu Dhabi with extensive everyday contact with Asian people
- Outcome
- Recognition memory (d') for Asian vs Caucasian faces, the other-race effect, and horizontal position of the first two fixations during learning
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
More experience with Asian people predicted a smaller other-race effect and better memory for Asian faces. Implicit bias interacted with face recognition ability: among weak face recognisers bias made no difference, but among strong recognisers a more negative bias toward Asians went with better memory for Asian faces and second fixations placed further to the left of the face. Memory for own-race faces was predicted only by face recognition ability, and response-time measures of the other-race effect showed no effects.
Methodology
White students living in a highly multicultural city studied and then recognised Asian and Caucasian faces while their eye movements were tracked. They also completed an Implicit Association Test measuring implicit attitudes toward Asians, the Cambridge Face Memory Test of face recognition ability, and questionnaires on social contact and individuating experience with each race. Regression models tested whether these three factors, and the bias-by-ability interaction, predicted face memory and where people first looked on the faces.
Limitations
This is correlational, so it cannot show that implicit bias causes better or worse face memory; the surprising negative-bias finding comes from a single modest sample and an interaction effect, which needs replication. All participants were White and highly experienced with Asians, so the pattern may not hold for other groups or for people with little contact. Participants came from many countries, so the Caucasian test faces were not a perfect own-race match for everyone, and the proposed explanation (extra attention driven by perceived threat) was not tested.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.