Skip to content
PaperFren

Climate impacts

Moss and organic soil keep permafrost closer to the surface

Fisher JP, Estop-Aragonés C, Thierry A, et al. · Global change biology · 2016

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Across four Canadian boreal sites, moss and organic-matter thickness lowered active-layer thickness; the tobit model explained 73% of ALT variation.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsClimate impactsconcept

    This library holds 13 empirical papers on climate impacts with measured outcomes rather than reviews.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsClimate impactsconcept

    Across four Canadian boreal sites, moss and organic-matter thickness lowered active-layer thickness; the tobit model explained 73% of ALT variation.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsClimate impactsconcept

    A hotspot, a forest plot or a paleo assemblage does not fix global climate sensitivity.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Field survey of active-layer thickness vs moss/OM and canopy LAI in burned and unburned black spruce
N
N=108 · 108 plots across four Canadian boreal sites
Population
Burned and unburned black-spruce stands in Canadian boreal forest
Outcome
Active-layer thickness predicted by moss, organic matter, moisture, slope, and LAI

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Moss and organic soil keep permafrost closer to the surface

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

What happened to ALT as moss thickened?

As moss layer thickness increased ALT decreased. This relationship took the form of an exponential decay, suggesting that increases in shallow moss layers had a greater impact on ALT than in deeper moss layers

Which land-cover contrasts were sampled?

Site characteristics contrasted as expected for these land cover units.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Thicker moss reduced ALT exponentially. Thicker OM also reduced ALT, interacting with slope. Tree LAI and moisture interactions mattered. Combined predictors explained 73% of ALT (pseudo R² = 0.734).

Methodology

Researchers measured ALT, moss/OM thickness, soil moisture, slope, and tree/understory LAI in burned and unburned black-spruce stands, then fit tobit regressions and SEM because some ALTs exceeded the 150 cm probe.

Limitations

Four sites in one region cannot map pan-Arctic carbon release; 150 cm censoring and a single season limit inference about long-term thaw trajectories.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.