Skip to content
PaperFren

Metabolism

How do Cryptosporidium oocysts survive outside hosts?

Zhang H, Guo F, Zhou H, et al. · BMC genomics · 2012

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Oocyst transcriptomes reveal metabolic features that help Cryptosporidium parvum endure environmental stresses without nutrient supply.

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — Transcriptome profiling of C. parvum oocysts to infer environmental persistence metabolism
N
Parasite oocyst transcriptome resource — no single sample N in stored text
Population
Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
Outcome
Metabolic features linked to environmental persistence

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Unique metabolic features linked to surviving without nutrients and resisting environmental stresses; oocyst wall protects four sporozoites.

Methodology

Profiled C. parvum oocyst transcriptomes to infer metabolic capacity related to environmental persistence.

Limitations

Does not itself invent a new clinical drug regimen.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • Several papers tagged for this method barely use qPCR as the headline assay. Cryptosporidium oocyst work is a transcriptome of environmental persistence; FECR1 function was tested with dCas9 chromatin immunoprecipitation and TET1/DNMT1 regulation in MDA-MB231 cells; rice histone Kbu/Kcr maps came from mass spectrometry and ChIP-seq. Any qPCR in those studies is at most a supporting check.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • Lexicon tagging also pulls in studies whose core methods are RNA-seq, CasIP or ChIP-seq/MS. Cryptosporidium metabolic inferences, FECR1 promoter RNA pull-downs, and rice histone acylations should not be read as qPCR papers that measured the same class of target.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.