Skip to content
PaperFren

Concept · medicine

Oncology Outcomes

4 studies1 discovery

Oncology outcomes research tracks survival, treatment effects, and care quality for people with cancer.

Students meet cancer epidemiology and outcomes early; this cluster keeps claims tied to measured endpoints.

Studies

4

Findings

5

7 supporting · 0 challenging · 0 qualifying citations

Open tensions

1

Currently

What we know

  1. Multiple studies in this library examine oncology outcomes with empirical patient or population outcomes rather than opinion alone.
  2. High-grade tumors had higher ANXA1 odds (OR adj 1.59); ANXA1 linked to basal-like/TN features; HER2+ ANXA1-overexpressing cases had worse 10-year BCSS (HR adj 1.70).
  3. An overall negative SES–survival gradient was present. Stage contribution was inconsistent, smoking was important, and after adjusting for stage and smoking the education and income differences became non-significant.
  4. Among 1670 patients analysed by intention to treat (841 propofol, 829 sevoflurane), five-year survival was about 92% in both arms, with a hazard ratio near 1 and no statistically significant difference. Results were similar after per-protocol analysis and adjustment for uneven triple-negative receptor status.
  5. All unmarried groups had excess mortality vs married; for men, never-married excess mortality rose ~3.4 percentage points per decade, mainly among those diagnosed after age 70.

Largest unresolved question

Effect sizes and settings differ across oncology outcomes studies — digital vs clinic, trial vs observational — so results should not be pooled casually.

Common misconceptions

  • Oncology Outcomes findings always generalise to every clinic.

    These studies are context-bound; designs, populations, and endpoints limit transfer.

Related