Skip to content
PaperFren

Thalidomide's second life in Indian leprosy

Open paper intelligence

Wimmelbücker and Kar show India’s thalidomide path ran through leprosy NGOs and delayed state control, not the 1960s sleeping-pill market of Europe.

Source

A history of thalidomide in India

Wimmelbücker L, Kar A · Medical history · 2023

doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2023.27Read the full paper ↗4 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Qualitative / archival — Documentary reconstruction of thalidomide’s Indian path via leprosy NGOs and delayed regulation
N
Archival/clinical/press sources (Grünenthal trials, WHO leprosy files); not a primary sample N
Population
Thalidomide importation, ENL trials, and regulation in India from the 1960s onward
Outcome
India’s thalidomide history through leprosy treatment rather than a 1960s hypnotic mass market

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

What they did

The authors use Grünenthal trial documents, Israeli papers on Sheskin, WHO leprosy files, and published clinical and press sources—company archives still closed; Indian ministry and CLTRI holdings not then accessible—to track import, ENL trials after 1965, 1986 distribution responsibility, and 2002 approval for ENL and myeloma.

What they found

DCBL held Commonwealth rights including India, but the 1960s hypnotic market barely opened. After Sheskin, European mission doctors and WHO brought the drug for type-2 leprosy reactions in the country with the world’s largest leprosy population. Safety sat with doctors and the producer until 1986. No confirmed Indian embryopathy case is documented; surveillance remains weak as uses expand.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Closed company and ministry archives limit the record. The 5000/3000 birth-defect figures refer to recognised cases in rich countries, not India. Absence of confirmed Indian cases is not proof of zero harm.

Key terms

Thalidomide embryopathy
Birth defects from maternal intake roughly between days 20 and 36 of gestation.
ENL / type 2 reaction
Severe leprosy reaction for which thalidomide was reused from the mid-1960s.
DCBL
Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Limited, British licencee with Commonwealth sales rights including India.
1986 shift
When the government of India began taking responsibility for distribution and adverse-effect monitoring.

Flashcards

1 / 11

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

India’s main historical use of thalidomide here is?

Common questions

Why little 1960 hypnotic use in India?

Late commercial interest plus a growing domestic industry and later patent-term limits reduced import openings.

How did the drug return?

As treatment for leprosy reactions, via NGOs, Sheskin’s report, Grünenthal supply, and WHO.

What is unfinished?

Implementing embryotoxic safety in a large diverse market, especially private-sector use after 2002.

More on Public health