Skip to content
PaperFren

English TBQ validation

Open paper intelligence

Researchers adapted and validated an English Treatment Burden Questionnaire for chronic illness across US/UK/Canada/Australia using PatientsLikeMe.

Source

Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform

Tran VT, Harrington M, Montori VM, et al. · BMC medicine · 2014

doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-109Read the full paper ↗198 citationscc by

Inspect source passages

English TBQ validation

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

610 of 3,000 invited patients completed the TBQ (20.3%).

In total, 3,000 patients were invited to complete the TBQ, and 610 (20.3%) did so between September and October 2013.

First factor explained 87% of the variance.

The first factor explained 87% of the variance, and had an eigenvalue of 5.91.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

After pretesting and wording changes, 3,000 PatientsLikeMe members were invited; 610 completed the English TBQ; factor structure, construct validity, and reliability were assessed.

What they found

TBQ showed a dominant first factor (87% variance), high item completion, and validity as a cross-condition treatment-burden measure—the first such English instrument in these countries.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Online chronic-illness volunteers may not represent all clinic populations, and burden scores are self-report.

Key terms

Treatment burden
Workload and impact of health-care tasks on patients’ lives.
TBQ
Treatment Burden Questionnaire summing item burden scores.
PatientsLikeMe
Online patient network used for recruitment and feedback.
Construct validity
Evidence the scale relates to expected concepts such as adherence/QoL.
Test–retest reliability
Stability of scores over repeated administration.
Factor structure
How items cluster; here one dominant factor explained most variance.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Main product of this study?

Common questions

How many completed validation?

610 of 3,000 invited (20.3%).

Where were patients from?

Mainly USA, also Canada, UK, Australia and others.

What was added in English adaptation?

Items on financial burden and provider relationships.

Key result?

First validated English TBQ for multi-condition treatment burden.

More on Treatment adherence