Skip to content
PaperFren

Phone telemonitoring after heart-failure flare

Open paper intelligence

Home mobile-phone telemonitoring after acute heart-failure decompensation cut primary events and hospital days versus usual care.

Source

Effect of home-based telemonitoring using mobile phone technology on the outcome of heart failure patients after an episode of acute decompensation: randomized controlled trial

Scherr D, Kastner P, Kollmann A, et al. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2009

doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1252Read the full paper ↗185 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
RCT — MOBITEL multicentre RCT; home telemonitoring via mobile phones vs control
N
N=120 · Stopped early at 120 of a planned 240 (eight centres; median age 66); many patients could not operate the phone
Population
Adults after acute heart-failure decompensation
Outcome
Cardiovascular death or HF re-hospitalisation over 6 months

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Phone telemonitoring after heart-failure flare

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

ITT primary events 17% tele vs 33% control (RRR 50%).

Intention-to-treat analysis indicated that 18 control group patients (33%) reached the primary endpoint (1 death, 17 hospitalizations) compared with 11 tele group patients (17%, 0 deaths, 11 hospitalizations; relative risk reduction 50%, 95% CI 3-74%, P = .06; a).

120 patients were randomized.

Overall, 120 patients (85 male, 35 female) with a median age of 66 years (IQR 62-72) were randomized in eight centers: 54 patients were randomized to the control group (39 m
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

MOBITEL randomized 120 patients after acute decompensation to home telemonitoring via mobile phones versus control across eight centres, following primary death/HF hospitalization endpoints for 6 months.

What they found

ITT primary events 17% tele vs 33% control (RRR 50%, P=.06); per-protocol RRR 54% (P=.04); NYHA improved only in tele group; HF hospital stays shorter (median 6.5 vs 10 days).

The limits

What it doesn't show

Whether modern smartphones change effect sizes, and some patients were “never beginners” unable to use equipment.

Key terms

Telemonitoring
Remote transmission of patient physiologic/symptom data for clinical oversight.
Acute decompensation
Worsening heart failure prompting acute care before enrolment.
NYHA class
Functional class of heart-failure symptom limitation.
Intention-to-treat (ITT)
Analyze as randomized, including non-starters.
Per-protocol analysis
Analyze participants who followed assigned monitoring as intended.
Relative risk reduction
Proportional decrease in event risk in intervention vs control.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

ITT primary events were roughly:

Common questions

What was the ITT primary-event contrast?

17% tele vs 33% control (RRR 50%, P=.06).

Did per-protocol results strengthen?

Yes—15% events in tele group, RRR 54%, P=.04.

Did symptoms improve?

Median NYHA improved 3→2 only in the tele group.

Hospital length of stay?

Shorter in tele patients hospitalized for worsening HF (6.5 vs 10 days).

More on Cardiovascular