Adaptive digital feedback and self-regulated learning
A semester-long mixed-methods study found task enjoyment and personalized adaptive feedback central to how university students plan and regulate learning with a digital tool.
Source
Effects of adaptive feedback through a digital tool - a mixed-methods study on the course of self-regulated learning
What they did
Researchers embedded an adaptive learning tool (“studybuddy”) in a Swiss university methods course and followed students over a semester using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Quantitative SRL measures (n=33) were integrated with qualitative evidence on how learners perceived and used adaptive feedback across SRL phases.
What they found
Quantitative and qualitative strands converged on task-related enjoyment as an important prerequisite for pre-actional planning, with personalized feedback shaping how students integrated guidance into learning actions. The study maps SRL across pre-actional, actional, and post-actional phases in a digital setting.
The limits
What it doesn't show
Authors note the lack of a control group, so effects cannot be definitively attributed to the tool. The small single-course sample limits generalizability beyond this higher-education context.
Key terms
- Self-regulated learning (SRL)
- Planning, monitoring, and adapting one’s own learning processes toward goals.
- Adaptive feedback
- Feedback tailored to a learner’s state or performance rather than one-size-fits-all comments.
- Pre-actional phase
- The planning stage of learning before task performance begins.
- Convergent parallel design
- Collecting qualitative and quantitative data in the same phase and integrating findings.
- studybuddy
- The digital tool used in the course to capture SRL and deliver adaptive feedback.
Flashcards
Want these cards to stick?
Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.
Quiz yourself
What was studybuddy used for?
Common questions
What tool delivered the feedback?
A digital tool called studybuddy used in a methods course.
How many students were in the quantitative sample?
33 students (mean age 26.3).
What emotion mattered for planning?
Task-related enjoyment was highlighted as important for pre-actional planning.
Can we say the tool caused better SRL?
Not definitively—the authors caution there was no control group.
More on Feedback