How US presidents shaped 35 years of AIDS policy
Padamsee shows federal HIV policy zig-zagged with Republican and Democratic presidencies more than with science or caseloads alone.
Source
Fighting an Epidemic in Political Context: Thirty-Five Years of HIV/AIDS Policy Making in the United States
Study at a glance
- Design
- Qualitative / archival — Legislative/media/advocacy document analysis plus elite interviews on US HIV policy 1981–2016
- N
- N=70 · More than 70 original US interviews (2005, 2010–12), plus UK comparison interviews
- Population
- US federal HIV/AIDS policy making from 1981 to 2016
- Outcome
- Partisan zig-zags in prevention, treatment finance, and research priorities
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Inspect source passages
How US presidents shaped 35 years of AIDS policy
These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.
The author conducted more than 70 original US interviews in 2005 and 2010–12.
The second comprises more than 70 original, semi-structured interviews I conducted in 2005 and 2010–12 with policy makers and advocates who played key roles in the formulation of federal HIV/AIDS policy across various administrations (see for a listing of informants’ roles).
CDC published the first official US report in June 1981.
In June 1981, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the first official US report on the new disease.
What they did
She read legislative histories, New York Times and Kaiser reporting, government and advocacy documents, and conducted more than 70 US interviews (2005, 2010–12), with UK comparison interviews, to periodise prevention, treatment-finance, and research from 1981 to 2016.
What they found
Research moved relatively smoothly; treatment finance lagged until CARE (1990) and later the ACA; prevention swung with ideology (Helms 1988, needle-exchange bans, abstinence under G. W. Bush, Obama’s Strategy and ACA). Party worldviews shaped which populations and which sciences counted.
The limits
What it doesn't show
It is not a clinical outcome study and cannot forecast post-2016 ACA repeal fights in detail; UK parallels are selective, and interview samples are elite policymakers and advocates.
Key terms
- Helms Amendment 1988
- Barred federally funded prevention materials thought to promote homosexual sex; pushed abstinence.
- Ryan White CARE Act 1990
- Created a safety-net funding structure for HIV care, drugs, and support services.
- HAART
- 1996 combination antiretroviral therapy that turned HIV toward a chronic disease for those who could get it.
- PEPFAR
- George W. Bush’s global AIDS treatment programme that recast the epidemic as chiefly international.
- National HIV/AIDS Strategy 2010
- Obama-era targets on infections, care, disparities, and coordination, without a new budget line.
Flashcards
0 of 10 answers reviewed
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
CDC’s first official US AIDS report appeared in:
Common questions
When did CDC first report the new disease?
June 1981.
What did the 1988 Helms Amendment do?
Required abstinence emphasis and barred materials thought to promote homosexual sex.
What 1990 law financed HIV services?
The Ryan White CARE Act.
Which 2010 law most expanded HIV treatment access?
The Affordable Care Act (alongside CARE reauthorisation).
More on Epidemics