Skip to content
PaperFren

Diabetes prevalence and risk-score accuracy

Open paper intelligence

Hindustani Surinamese had ~26% diabetes prevalence; a clinical risk score showed moderate-to-good AUCs (~0.74–0.80) across ethnic groups.

Source

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and the performance of a risk score among Hindustani Surinamese, African Surinamese and ethnic Dutch: a cross-sectional population-based study

Bindraban NR, van Valkengoed IG, Mairuhu G, et al. · BMC public health · 2008

doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-271Read the full paper ↗87 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — SUNSET Amsterdam population sample; ethnicity-stratified screening criteria
N
N=1434 · 339 Hindustani Surinamese, 605 African Surinamese, 490 Dutch
Population
Amsterdam adults aged 35–60 (Hindustani Surinamese, African Surinamese, Dutch)
Outcome
Diabetes prevalence and risk-score AUC / numbers-needed-to-screen by ethnicity

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Diabetes prevalence and risk-score accuracy

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Hindustani DM prevalence 25.6%.

Overall, Hindustani Surinamese had the highest prevalence of DM 25.6%, followed by African Surinamese 12.7% and Dutch 6.8%. T

AUC 0.74/0.80/0.78 by ethnicity.

Application of the risk score (set 4) resulted in a moderate to good diagnostic accuracy: the AUC was 0.74 (0.70–0.79) for the Hindustani Surinamese, 0.80 (0.75–0.85) for the African Surinamese, and 0.78 (0.73–0.85) for the Dutch, with a NNS of 3 among the Hindustani Surinamese, 5 among the African Surinamese, and 7 among the Dutch. Trend
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Cross-sectional population sample compared known/new diabetes prevalence among Hindustani Surinamese, African Surinamese, and Dutch adults and tested screening criteria including a risk score.

What they found

Prevalence was 25.6%, 12.7%, and 6.8% respectively. Risk-score AUCs were 0.74, 0.80, and 0.78 with NNS 3, 5, and 7.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Cross-sectional Amsterdam-based sample may not generalise globally; score cut-offs trade sensitivity vs workload.

Key terms

Risk score
Non-invasive score to select people for glucose testing.
AUC
Area under ROC curve for discrimination.
NNS
Number needed to screen to detect one case.
Hindustani Surinamese
South Asian–origin ethnic group in the study.
Newly detected DM
Diabetes found by study testing.
Cross-sectional
Single-time population survey.

Flashcards

1 / 10

0 of 10 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Hindustani prevalence:

Common questions

Hindustani prevalence?

25.6%.

Dutch prevalence?

6.8%.

AUC range?

0.74–0.80.

NNS Hindustani?

3.

More on Diagnostic accuracy