Does the WHO GPAQ match a wearable for activity and sitting?
In 95 adults, GPAQ moderately matched Actigraph MVPA (r=0.48) but poorly captured sitting time (r=0.19), with a 349 min/day sedentary gap.
Source
Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Study at a glance
- Design
- Cross-sectional — Criterion-validity study of WHO GPAQ vs 7-day Actigraph GT3X; random subsample repeated at 3–6 months to assess change.
- N
- N=95 · 101 selected; 95 completed baseline (44 female, 51 male); change analyses in 41.
- Population
- Adults sampled from an ongoing study, stratified by GPAQ activity level (low/moderate/high) and sex.
- Outcome
- Agreement of GPAQ vs accelerometer for MVPA and sedentary time (mins/day) and for change.
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
What they did
Randomly selected 101 adults stratified by GPAQ activity and sex, had them wear an Actigraph GT3X for 7 days and complete GPAQ on day 7, and repeated the protocol 3–6 months later in a subsample.
What they found
95 completed baseline (mean age 44). MVPA mins/day agreed moderately (r=0.48; mean difference −0.8 min/day) with over-reporting among the most active. Sedentary behaviour agreed poorly (r=0.19; +348.7 min/day). Change in MVPA correlated moderately (r=0.52); change in sitting did not (r=−0.024).
The limits
What it doesn't show
A 95-person Northern Ireland sample cannot prove GPAQ works in every country; change n=41 was underpowered, and self-report still misses posture-level sitting.
Key terms
- GPAQ
- WHO Global Physical Activity Questionnaire used for MVPA and sedentary surveillance.
- MVPA
- Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, compared here in minutes per day.
- Sedentary behaviour (SB)
- Sitting/lying waking time; GPAQ tracked this much less accurately than MVPA.
- Actigraph GT3X
- Hip-worn accelerometer used as the 7-day objective criterion.
- Bland–Altman analysis
- Plots of agreement and bias between self-report and accelerometer mins/day.
- Spearman’s rho
- Rank correlation used for criterion validity and for change.
Flashcards
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
Baseline analytic n was:
Common questions
How many people completed baseline?
95 of 101 selected (44 female, 51 male; mean age 44).
How well did GPAQ match MVPA?
Moderate agreement, r=0.48; mean difference only −0.8 min/day.
How well did it match sitting time?
Poorly (r=0.19) with +348.7 min/day vs the accelerometer.
Can GPAQ track change?
Change in MVPA correlated moderately (r=0.52); sedentary change did not.
More on Health behaviour