Skip to content
PaperFren

Sea level

How dams fingerprint regional sea-level change

Hawley WB, Hay CC, Mitrovica JX, et al. · Earth's future · 2020

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Impounding reservoir water lowers global mean sea level but can raise relative sea level within about 2000 km of large dams.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsSea levelconcept

    This library holds 3 empirical papers on sea level with measured outcomes rather than reviews.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSea levelconcept

    Impounding reservoir water lowers global mean sea level but can raise relative sea level within about 2000 km of large dams.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSea levelconcept

    A reef isostasy study or a CMIP transient fingerprint is not a local flood map.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSatellite Altimetrymethod

    GRanD reservoirs hold 5,979 km³, equal to a 16.6 mm global-mean sea-level fall (0.15 mm/yr) for 1900–2011; with seepage the drop is 21.8 mm by 2011 and 30.1 mm by 2040. Nearby relative sea level can rise ~40 mm (Manicouagan), opposite the global mean. This is a GRD fingerprint calculation, not an altimeter time series. GRanD holds only ~72% of World Register of Dams volume; 3-D Earth structure is neglected (~1% fingerprint error).

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSatellite Altimetrymethod

    Only two papers actually confront an altimeter product. The Gulf Stream jump is a hosing-model event with an AVISO northward-shift hint near separation; lead times may differ because the Florida Current is 14% weak and the DWBC 36% strong versus reanalysis. The dam paper is a mass-fingerprint budget term with no altimeter. Combining ‘AVISO shows the Stream jumped’ with ‘dams lowered GMSL 16.6 mm’ as two altimetry results is a category error.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    SupportsSea level

    A reef isostasy study or a CMIP transient fingerprint is not a local flood map.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Only two papers actually confront an altimeter product. The Gulf Stream jump is a hosing-model event with an AVISO northward-shift hint near separation; lead times may differ because the Florida Current is 14% weak and the DWBC 36% strong versus reanalysis. The dam paper is a mass-fingerprint budget term with no altimeter. Combining ‘AVISO shows the Stream jumped’ with ‘dams lowered GMSL 16.6 mm’ as two altimetry results is a category error.

    Also on this tension

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — GRD sea-level fingerprints of GRanD reservoir impoundment plus seepage and future dams
N
N=6329 · 6,329 post-1900 GRanD reservoirs (5,979 km³ total volume)
Population
Global artificial reservoirs in the GRanD database (1900–2011) and projected Zarfl dams
Outcome
Global mean and spatially variable relative sea-level change from water impoundment

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

How dams fingerprint regional sea-level change

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

What three processes make the local fingerprint?

The redistribution of water from the ocean to the reservoir will (1) increase the gravitational attraction of the reservoir on the surrounding water and thus raise the local sea surface height, (2) induce a change in Earth's moment of inertia, and (3) drive local crustal subsidence.

Why not scale GRanD volume up to the World Register of Dams?

Although the GRanD database contains only ~72% of the volume reported in the WRD, we do not scale our total impounded water volume to match the WRD values because the primary purpose of this study is to estimate the spatial variability of sea level, and water impoundment not included in the GRanD database has an unknown geographical distribution.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

GRanD volume of 5,979 km³ equals a 16.6 mm GMSL fall (0.15 mm/yr); with seepage the drop is 21.8 mm by 2011 and 30.1 mm by 2040. Nearby relative sea level can rise ~40 mm (Manicouagan), opposite the global mean.

Methodology

Authors computed yearly gravitational-rotational-deformational sea-level fingerprints for GRanD reservoirs (1900–2011), added seepage, and projected Zarfl hydropower dams to 2040.

Limitations

GRanD holds only ~72% of WRD volume with unknown geography for the rest; future volumes are inferred from hydropower capacity, and 3-D Earth structure is neglected (~1% fingerprint error).

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.