Skip to content
PaperFren

Permafrost

Aged permafrost carbon surged in Arctic rivers in 2018

Schwab MS, Hilton RG, Raymond PA, et al. · Geophysical research letters · 2020

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

June 2018 Mackenzie basin rivers exported previously modern-looking DOC that was suddenly centuries old, with a nitrate spike, then modern again in 2019.

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Spring-freshet DOC Δ14C sampling in Mackenzie basin rivers vs ArcticGRO record
N
N=28 · June 2018 mean DOC-F14C from n=28 samples (2017 comparison n=22)
Population
Mackenzie, Peel, and Arctic Red river DOC during spring freshets 2017–2019
Outcome
Abrupt aging of exported DOC and nitrate spike in June 2018

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

2003–2017 DOC was modern (F14C ≈ 1.00). In June 2018 mean F14C fell to 0.85 (about 1,300 14C years), as low as 0.51 in northern tributaries, with a two- to threefold nitrate increase, consistent with supra-permafrost talik flow. 2019 returned to F14C ≈ 0.99.

Methodology

Authors measured DOC Δ14C, concentrations, and major ions in the Mackenzie, Peel, and Arctic Red during 2017–2019 spring freshets and compared them with ArcticGRO samples back to 2003.

Limitations

Snapshot sampling cannot time the event’s duration or Arctic-wide carbon feedback; 2018/19 June discharges were the lowest in the set, though still not hydrograph outliers versus F14C.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsPermafrostconcept

    June 2018 Mackenzie basin rivers exported previously modern-looking DOC that was suddenly centuries old, with a nitrate spike, then modern again in 2019.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsRadiocarbon Datingmethod

    Mackenzie, Peel and Arctic Red DOC was modern from 2003–2017 (F¹⁴C ≈ 1.00). In June 2018 mean F¹⁴C fell to 0.85 (about 1,300 ¹⁴C years), as low as 0.51 in northern tributaries, with a two- to threefold nitrate increase, consistent with supra-permafrost talik flow. June 2019 returned to F¹⁴C ≈ 0.99. Snapshot sampling cannot time the event’s duration or an Arctic-wide carbon feedback; 2018/19 June discharges were the lowest in the set but not hydrograph outliers versus F¹⁴C.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsRadiocarbon Datingmethod

    Old ¹⁴C on the Beaufort Sea coast and aged DOC in the Mackenzie basin are not the same carbon pathway. Herschel thaw-stream and resuspension-zone POC is millennial (8,300–25,000 ¹⁴C years; mean resuspension Δ¹⁴C −867‰) and appears to settle 100–300 m offshore. Mackenzie DOC was modern for 15 years, then ~1,300 ¹⁴C years for one June, then modern again. One record is a nearshore particulate dump; the other is a dissolved pulse that reversed. Neither is a pan-Arctic CO₂ flux.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsRadiocarbon Datingmethod

    ¹⁴C years and COPRA speleothem years are different clocks. The permafrost papers report uncalibrated ¹⁴C ages and F¹⁴C/Δ¹⁴C on organic carbon. The Maya paper ensembles age models of cave calcite to date a rainfall-seasonality collapse. Treating τpred < significance in 800–1000 CE as a radiocarbon date of Classic Maya drought is a category error, even though the index lists the paper under this method.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Old ¹⁴C on the Beaufort Sea coast and aged DOC in the Mackenzie basin are not the same carbon pathway. Herschel thaw-stream and resuspension-zone POC is millennial (8,300–25,000 ¹⁴C years; mean resuspension Δ¹⁴C −867‰) and appears to settle 100–300 m offshore. Mackenzie DOC was modern for 15 years, then ~1,300 ¹⁴C years for one June, then modern again. One record is a nearshore particulate dump; the other is a dissolved pulse that reversed. Neither is a pan-Arctic CO₂ flux.

    Also on this tension

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    ¹⁴C years and COPRA speleothem years are different clocks. The permafrost papers report uncalibrated ¹⁴C ages and F¹⁴C/Δ¹⁴C on organic carbon. The Maya paper ensembles age models of cave calcite to date a rainfall-seasonality collapse. Treating τpred < significance in 800–1000 CE as a radiocarbon date of Classic Maya drought is a category error, even though the index lists the paper under this method.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.