Skip to content
PaperFren

Attention

Do green schoolyards help kids focus after recess?

Amicone G, Petruccelli I, De Dominicis S, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2018

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Spending recess in a natural school garden instead of a concrete courtyard improves children's attention and working memory.

Key findings

In the first study, children who spent recess in the green garden showed significant improvements in sustained attention and working memory, whereas those in the built courtyard did not. Additionally, children in both studies rated the green garden as significantly more restorative. In the second study, those who played freely in the natural area showed better post-recess attention than those restricted to the built area, who actually experienced a decline in concentration.

Methodology

Researchers conducted two field experiments with Italian primary school children. In the first study, 82 students in the fourth and fifth grades played a structured team game during morning recess in either a green garden or a concrete courtyard. In the second study, 36 fifth graders were allowed 30 minutes of free play during an afternoon recess in either a natural or built setting.

Limitations

This research cannot prove long-term academic benefits, as it only measured cognitive performance immediately before and after a single recess block. The tests used in the first experiment may have been too easy, potentially causing a ceiling effect that masked improvements in impulse control. Additionally, because the second study forced one group of children to stay in the built area when they wanted to play in the garden, their drop in attention might reflect frustration or a constrained restoration effect rather than the concrete environment itself. Finally, the small sample size of 36 children in the second study limits the generalizability of these findings.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.