Attention
Do children with obesity shift visual attention less efficiently?
Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC
Children with obesity were much slower than healthy-weight peers when a cue pointed the wrong way, and their brain responses to targets were smaller.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Case-control — Obese vs healthy-weight children matched on fitness, IQ and parental education performed the Posner cueing task with concurrent EEG.
- N
- N=52 · 52 children aged 9-10: 26 obese and 26 healthy-weight controls.
- Population
- Right-handed children aged 9-10 from mainstream urban classrooms in Taiwan, without ADHD or neurological problems.
- Outcome
- Reaction times and errors on valid and invalid cue trials; target-evoked P3 latency and amplitude.
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
Key findings
Error rates did not differ between groups. The obese group was slower overall, but the difference was concentrated in invalid trials (551.63 ms versus 447.11 ms), so the cost of redirecting attention was roughly twice as large (144.11 ms versus 77.51 ms). P3 latency did not differ, but P3 amplitude was markedly smaller in the obese group (8.32 versus 15.03 microvolts).
Methodology
The researchers tested 52 children aged 9-10, half with obesity and half healthy weight, matched on cardiorespiratory fitness, IQ and parental education and screened for ADHD. Each child did 180 trials of the Posner task, in which an arrow cue points left or right and a target then appears either where the cue pointed (valid) or on the other side (invalid), while EEG recorded the P3 brain response.
Limitations
The design is cross-sectional, so it cannot show whether obesity impairs attention, attention problems contribute to weight gain, or a third factor drives both, a limitation the authors acknowledge. The sample is small and from one region, and only an endogenous (arrow-cue) task was used, so it is unknown whether automatic, stimulus-driven attention shifts are also affected. Metabolic factors such as insulin resistance were not measured, although the authors suggest they may matter.
How this study connects
Role on claims
Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.
Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.
Related papers in this topic
Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.