Is the colon lining’s microbiome different in cancer?
In 31 CRC patients vs 30 healthy volunteers, tumor mucosa had lower 16S diversity, more Firmicutes and Fusobacteria, and less Proteobacteria; Lactococcus/Fusobacterium rose in tumors while Pseudomonas fell.
Source
Microbiota disbiosis is associated with colorectal cancer
Study at a glance
- Design
- Case-control — 16S V3 pyrosequencing of CRC mucosa vs adjacent tissue vs healthy colonoscopy controls, including proximal vs distal tumors
- N
- N=61 · 31 CRC patients (31 tumor, 20 adjacent; 15 proximal, 16 distal) plus 30 healthy volunteers (15 proximal, 15 distal mucosa); 81 sequenced samples
- Population
- Recently diagnosed CRC patients and healthy colonoscopy volunteers (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital)
- Outcome
- Mucosa-associated 16S community structure, diversity, and taxon abundances
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
What they did
Pyrosequenced 16S rRNA V3 from 31 CRC tumors, 20 adjacent non-cancerous mucosa, and 30 healthy mucosal samples (proximal and distal), clustering OTUs at 97% identity (mean 17,018 reads/sample).
What they found
Shannon diversity 3.43 vs 4.01 in CRC vs healthy (P<0.001). Firmicutes 63.46% vs 43.36%; Proteobacteria 10.66% vs 60.35%; Fusobacteria 10.58% vs 0.03% (all P<0.001). Tumors vs adjacent: more Firmicutes (P=0.03), less Proteobacteria (P<0.01); Lactococcus 50.85% vs 25.35% (P=0.007).
The limits
What it doesn't show
Cross-sectional mucosa snapshots cannot prove these taxa cause CRC or that probiotics would treat it; relative abundances from V3 454 data are not absolute counts.
Key terms
- Dysbiosis
- Shifted microbial community; here CRC mucosa differed from healthy and from adjacent tissue.
- 16S rRNA V3
- Variable region of bacterial ribosomal RNA used to profile communities by pyrosequencing.
- Fusobacterium
- Genus enriched in CRC mucosa (~10% vs ~0.01% in healthy); linked in other work to inflammation and CRC subsets.
- Firmicutes
- Dominant phylum in CRC mucosa (63%) versus 43% in healthy samples.
- Proteobacteria
- Phylum that dominated healthy mucosa (~60%) but only ~11% of CRC mucosa.
- OTU
- Operational taxonomic unit clustered at 97% 16S similarity; ~1,839 OTUs per sample here.
Flashcards
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
People sampled:
Common questions
How many people?
31 CRC patients and 30 healthy volunteers (81 samples).
Shannon diversity?
3.43 ± 0.60 in CRC vs 4.01 ± 0.58 in healthy (P<0.001).
Fusobacteria in CRC vs healthy?
10.58% vs 0.03%.
Lactococcus in tumor vs adjacent?
50.85% vs 25.35% (P=0.007).
More on Microbiome