Do ‘single-cell’ Mtb preps change macrophage results?
Gentle sonication made Mtb hyperinflammatory (TLR2-high IL-1β/TNF) yet still replicative in macrophages, while filtering blunted inflammation and attenuated intracellular survival — so prep method can rewrite host–pathogen readouts.
Source
Single cell preparations of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> damage the mycobacterial envelope and disrupt macrophage interactions
Study at a glance
- Design
- Animal / in-vitro — In-vitro Mtb single-cell prep (sonication vs 5 μm filter vs spin) infecting mouse BMDMs; RNA-seq, cytokines, CFU, TEM; literature survey of 119 papers
- N
- N=5 · RNA-seq n=5 BMDM infections per condition (so/sp vs 5μmF, MOI 5, 72 h); plus TEM/CFU and 119-paper methods survey
- Population
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv and others) and mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages, including Tlr2−/−
- Outcome
- Envelope integrity, macrophage inflammatory gene expression/cytokines, and intracellular Mtb survival
Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.
What they did
Compared routine disaggregation (sonication, 5 μm filtering, spinning) for envelope damage (TEM), infected mouse BMDMs (RNA-seq n=5, cytokines, CFU), tested Tlr2−/− BMDMs, and surveyed how 119 papers reported single-cell methods.
What they found
Both sonication and filtering damaged the envelope. Sonicated bacilli drove higher TLR2-dependent transcription and IL-1β/TNF-α but replicated normally; filtered Mtb were hypo-inflammatory and attenuated. PDIM’s apparent anti-inflammatory effect depended on prep method. Only 39.5% of 119 papers reported how they made single-cell suspensions.
The limits
What it doesn't show
This is mouse BMDM work in vitro, not a clinical TB trial; other labs’ strains, detergents, or human macrophages may differ, and no single ‘correct’ prep is proven for all questions.
Key terms
- Single-cell preparation
- Disaggregating clumpy Mtb (sonication, filtering, syringing, spins) before macrophage infection.
- PDIM
- Phthiocerol dimycocerosate, a cell-envelope lipid thought to dampen macrophage inflammation — here prep-dependent.
- TLR2
- Host receptor driving much of the hyperinflammatory transcriptional response to sonicated Mtb.
- BMDM
- Mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages used as the infection model.
- MOI
- Multiplicity of infection; RNA-seq used MOI 5.
Flashcards
Research intelligence for this paper
See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.
Quiz yourself
Sonicated Mtb were:
Common questions
What did sonication do?
Damaged the envelope and made bacilli hyperinflammatory (TLR2, IL-1β, TNF-α) without blocking replication.
What did filtering do?
Little inflammatory response and attenuated intracellular survival.
How often do papers report the method?
Only 39.5% of 119 surveyed papers.
Does PDIM always dampen inflammation?
Its impact depended on how Mtb was prepared.
More on Host–pathogen