Skip to content
PaperFren

Where should new protected areas go?

Open paper intelligence

Most threatened vertebrates are inadequately protected; expanding reserves by cost or ecoregions alone poorly covers imperiled species.

Source

Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity

Venter O, Fuller RA, Segan DB, et al. · PLoS biology · 2014

doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891Read the full paper ↗216 citationscc by

Inspect source passages

Where should new protected areas go?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

17% of threatened vertebrates absent from any protected area; 85% inadequately covered

We find that 17% of threatened vertebrates are not found in a single protected area and 85% are not covered to the level of our adequacy targets ().

How many are adequately covered now?

A small minority (15%) of threatened vertebrates are adequately covered by existing protected areas.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Mapped global protected-area coverage against threatened vertebrate adequacy targets and compared expansion strategies toward Aichi goals.

What they found

17% of threatened vertebrates are in zero protected areas and 85% lack adequate coverage; cheap-land/ecoregion strategies are inefficient versus species-targeted expansion.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Does not itself create reserves or resolve all socio-political constraints of implementation.

Key terms

Protected area
Land set aside for biodiversity conservation.
Aichi targets
CBD goals including expanding terrestrial protection to 17% by 2020.
Adequacy target
Coverage level judged sufficient for a threatened species.
Spatial prioritization
Choosing locations to maximize conservation return.

Flashcards

1 / 11

0 of 11 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Threatened vertebrates with zero PA:

Common questions

How many threatened vertebrates lack any PA?

17%.

How many lack adequate coverage?

85%.

Is cheapest land efficient?

No—poor for threatened species coverage.

Policy frame?

Aichi target 11 expansion.

More on Biodiversity