Skip to content
PaperFren

LMS vs social networks and EFL engagement

Among Beijing university EFL students, engagement dimensions predicted educational-technology engagement, and LMS users reported higher engagement means than social-networking-system users.

Source

The effect of two educational technology tools on student engagement in Chinese EFL courses

Teng Y, Wang X · International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2021

doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00263-0Read the full paper ↗9 citationscc by

What they did

268 undergraduates/graduates in compulsory EFL courses completed an engagement questionnaire comparing learning management systems and social networking systems (e.g., WeChat/QQ), analyzing correlations, regression, and independent-samples differences.

What they found

Behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement correlated with and predicted educational-technology engagement (emotional engagement strongest). More students preferred LMS than SNS; LMS means were significantly higher across engagement aspects.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Self-selected tool preference and cross-sectional ratings cannot prove that switching platforms causes higher engagement or achievement.

Key terms

Behavioral engagement
Observable participation such as attendance, preparation, and class contribution.
Cognitive engagement
Investment in learning and positive academic self-perceptions/future outlook.
Emotional engagement
Belonging, connectedness, and positive affective ties to peers/campus learning.
Learning management system (LMS)
Institutional platform for course materials, feedback, and study activities (e.g., Xuexitong).
Social networking systems
Tools like WeChat/QQ used for notifying, sharing, and communication in courses.
Educational technology engagement
Students’ engagement specifically with the technology tools used for learning.

Flashcards

1 / 12

Want these cards to stick?

Save the deck to NoteFren and study it with spaced repetition.

Save these cards to NoteFren— study “LMS vs social networks and EFL engagement” with spaced repetition

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

Which two tool types are compared?

Common questions

Who participated?

268 EFL undergraduates/graduates at a Beijing university.

Which two tool types were compared?

LMS vs social networking systems.

Which tool was preferred more often?

LMS (173 vs 95 choosing SNS).

Which engagement type most strongly predicted tech engagement?

Emotional engagement.

More on Engagement