Skip to content
PaperFren

What made emergency remote learning hard for students?

Open paper intelligence

Students in Finland and India reported many similar ERL challenges—schedules, distractions, weak peer communication—and only moderate engagement.

Source

What students want? Experiences, challenges, and engagement during Emergency Remote Learning amidst COVID-19 crisis

Tulaskar R, Turunen M · Education and information technologies · 2022

doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10747-1Read the full paper ↗12 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Other — Survey plus interview/diary follow-up of ERL experiences in Finland and India
N
N=138 · 138 university students across two pandemic waves
Population
University students in Finland and India during emergency remote learning
Outcome
Shared ERL challenges (schedules, distractions, peer communication) and moderate engagement

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

What made emergency remote learning hard for students?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

What does ERL stand for in this paper?

This makeshift online learning is coined as Emergency Remote Learning (ERL) since it was delivered in response to a crisis or catastrophe

How many students participated across surveys?

Total 138 students from different disciplines participated in the study
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Researchers surveyed 138 university students in Finland and India across two pandemic waves, then followed a smaller subset with interviews and diaries. They catalogued Emergency Remote Learning challenges, experiences, and engagement as campuses shifted online with little preparation.

What they found

Learning experiences were largely unsatisfactory at first; 132 of 138 faced multiple challenges (about four on average). Top issues included managing schedules and home distractions. Engagement was moderate; students gradually adjusted but did not fully accept ERL as a long-term normal.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Unequal country samples and voluntary participation limit population estimates. The study describes experiences rather than testing a specific instructional intervention’s causal effect on achievement.

Key terms

Emergency Remote Learning (ERL)
A temporary, crisis-driven shift of courses online without the design time of planned online programs.
Learning engagement
Students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive involvement with coursework.
Home-learning setup
The physical and social conditions at home that support or disrupt studying.
Longitudinal survey
Data collected from related cohorts or waves over time to track change.
Pedagogy-in-pandemic
Teaching and learning practices shaped by COVID-era constraints.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 7

ERL refers to:

Common questions

Were Finnish and Indian challenges totally different?

No — students in both contexts reported overlapping issues like schedules, boredom, distractions, and pessimistic emotions.

How common were challenges?

About 95.65% of participants faced at least four challenges on average.

Did students eventually love ERL?

They adjusted somewhat over time but did not indicate complete acceptance of ERL.

What challenges topped the list?

Managing schedules and distractions in the home-learning setup were among the most frequent.

More on Engagement