Skip to content
PaperFren

Air pollution

CalEnviroScreen tracks urban pollution and social vulnerability

Greenfield BK, Rajan J, McKone TE · Environmental health : a global access science source · 2017

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

California’s cumulative-impact screen captures urban/industrial pollution plus socioeconomic vulnerability, which together track environmentally related disease burden.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

Not yet placed on a claim. This paper has study layers, but no concept page yet cites it as support, challenge, or qualifier.

Inspect source passages

CalEnviroScreen tracks urban pollution and social vulnerability

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

First three principal components explain 50% of data variability

For the entire data set, the first three PCs explain 50% of data variability in combination.

First PC explains 23% of variation

The first principal component (PC) (Fig. , horizontal axis), explaining 23% of variation, is positively associated with all variables except for a weak negative association with pesticide use and impaired water bodies.
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

The first three PCs explained 50% of indicator variance. CalEnviroScreen scores correlated strongly with the leading all-variable PC (ρ=0.95) and socioeconomic PC (ρ=0.82), moderately with the urban-pollution PC (ρ=0.59). Socioeconomic indicators explained more disease burden than environmental hazards; diesel PM correlated with PM2.5 (r=0.41) and traffic (r=0.56).

Methodology

Authors ran principal component analyses on CalEnviroScreen 3.0 indicators, mapped environmental versus socioeconomic axes, and compared those components with zip-code hospital disease-burden rates.

Limitations

The design is ecological, not causal, and cannot be read as individual risk. Environmental PCs were only weakly related to hospital rates, partly because health data were zip-code discharges aligned to census tracts.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.