Skip to content
PaperFren

Treatment adherence

ALICE pillbox app RCT

Mira JJ, Navarro I, Botella F, et al. · Journal of medical Internet research · 2014

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

A Spanish tablet pillbox app improved self-reported adherence and reduced missed doses over 3 months in older adults on multiple medicines.

Study at a glance

Design
RCT — 3-month ALICE tablet reminder vs no app
N
N=99 · 48 control, 51 experimental
Population
Older multimorbid outpatients on multiple medications in Spanish primary care
Outcome
MMAS-4 adherence, missed doses, and medication errors at 3 months

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Adherence scores rose 28.3% and missed doses fell 27.3% with ALICE; among those with ≥2 prior errors, medication errors fell 41.2%. Clinical labs did not meaningfully improve in 3 months.

Methodology

After co-design with patients and clinicians, investigators randomized older multimorbid outpatients to 3 months of ALICE tablet reminders versus no app, measuring MMAS-4 adherence, missed doses, and errors.

Limitations

Short follow-up and self-report limits prove hard clinical benefit or generalizability beyond Spanish primary care.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsTreatment Adherenceconcept

    Multiple studies in this library examine treatment adherence with empirical patient or population outcomes rather than opinion alone.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsTreatment Adherenceconcept

    Adherence scores rose 28.3% and missed doses fell 27.3% with ALICE; among those with ≥2 prior errors, medication errors fell 41.2%. Clinical labs did not meaningfully improve in 3 months.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsTreatment Adherenceconcept

    Effect sizes and settings differ across treatment adherence studies — digital vs clinic, trial vs observational — so results should not be pooled casually.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.