Skip to content
PaperFren

Technology integration quality and engagement

Open paper intelligence

Among Swiss upper-secondary students, validated TIQS dimensions—especially support for learning and classroom management—were positively related to behavioral engagement, while cognitive activation related to digital competencies.

Source

Quality of technology integration matters: Positive associations with students' behavioral engagement and digital competencies for learning

Consoli T, Schmitz ML, Antonietti C, et al. · Education and information technologies · 2025

doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13118-8Read the full paper ↗4 citationscc by

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — TIQS validation and SEM linking technology-integration quality to engagement
N
N=2281 · 2,281 second-year Swiss upper-secondary students
Population
Swiss upper-secondary students rating classroom technology integration
Outcome
Behavioral engagement and digital competencies related to TIQS quality dimensions

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Technology integration quality and engagement

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

Sample included 2,281 second-year upper-secondary students.

The sample used in this study consisted of 2,281 s-year upper secondary school students

Four EFA factors accounted for 57.8% of variance.

we retained four factors that accounted for 57.8% of the variance in the data.
Read passages in the original paper

What they did

Researchers developed the Technology Integration Quality Scale (TIQS), validated a four-factor structure with EFA/CFA in 2,281 second-year upper-secondary students, then used cluster-robust SEM to relate quality dimensions and technology-use frequency to behavioral engagement and self-assessed digital competencies.

What they found

Four factors fit well. Support for learning and classroom management positively predicted behavioral engagement; cognitive activation positively predicted digital competencies; technology-use frequency had smaller positive links. Individualized teaching unexpectedly related negatively to engagement in the reported models.

The limits

What it doesn't show

Cross-sectional student perceptions cannot prove that changing integration quality causes engagement gains, and unexpected negative paths need cautious interpretation.

Key terms

TIQS
Technology Integration Quality Scale measuring student perceptions of tech use for teaching-quality dimensions.
Support for learning
Technology used to support students’ learning experiences and relatedness/competence needs.
Cognitive activation
Instruction that prompts higher-order thinking and knowledge construction.
Behavioral engagement
Students’ active participation/effort in learning activities.
Digital competencies for learning
Students’ self-assessed skills for using digital tools to learn.
Classroom management
Using digital tools to structure and manage lessons effectively.

Flashcards

1 / 12

0 of 12 answers reviewed

Research intelligence for this paper

See its role on concept claims, tensions it is part of, placement history, and related discoveries.

Open paper intelligence

Quiz yourself

1 / 6

What does TIQS primarily measure?

Common questions

Who was surveyed?

2,281 second-year upper-secondary students in Switzerland.

What does TIQS measure?

Student perceptions of technology use supporting learning support, classroom management, individualized teaching, and cognitive activation.

What predicted behavioral engagement?

Support for learning and classroom management (plus a smaller frequency effect).

What predicted digital competencies?

Cognitive activation and, more weakly, frequency of technology use.

More on Engagement