Skip to content
PaperFren

Natural selection

Why is CCR5-Δ32 common only in Europe?

Novembre J, Galvani AP, Slatkin M · PLoS biology · 2005

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

CCR5-Δ32 likely rose under strong selection and spread fast by long-range dispersal; its range is limited more by time than by southern selection barriers.

Study at a glance

Design
Computational / modelling — Spatially explicit wave-of-advance model of CCR5-Δ32 frequency clines and allele age
N
Population-genetic modeling of allele frequencies — no single sample N
Population
Geographic CCR5-Δ32 allele-frequency data
Outcome
Selection and dispersal parameters explaining Δ32 geographic spread

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Strong selection (s≥0.1) and rapid long-range dispersal are needed; geographic restriction fits limited dispersal time better than purely local selection; origin may be outside northern Europe.

Methodology

Fit a spatially explicit wave-of-advance model to Δ32 frequency clines and allele-age estimates.

Limitations

Does not definitively identify the historical selective agent (plague vs smallpox debated).

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsNatural selectionconcept

    Multiple empirical papers in this library examine natural selection with mechanistic biological findings.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsNatural selectionconcept

    Strong selection (s≥0.1) and rapid long-range dispersal are needed; geographic restriction fits limited dispersal time better than purely local selection; origin may be outside northern Europe.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsNatural selectionconcept

    Systems and scales differ across natural selection studies (species, tissues, methods), so mechanisms should not be over-generalised.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.