Skip to content
PaperFren

Attention

Does learning a second language late still boost auditory attention?

Bak TH, Vega-Mendoza M, Sorace A · Frontiers in psychology · 2014

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Bilinguals show better auditory selective attention and mental switching than monolinguals, even if they learned their second language as teenagers.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsAttentionconcept

    Whether bilingualism confers an attentional advantage is unresolved within this corpus. One study found bilinguals outperformed monolinguals on auditory selective attention (r = −0.40 for late childhood bilinguals) and attentional switching; a lifespan study found almost no advantage across tasks, with monolinguals often faster or more accurate on the Simon task.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSelective Attentionconcept

    Bilingual individuals can exhibit superior auditory selective attention compared to monolinguals, a benefit that manifests even in those who acquired their second language during late childhood or early adulthood.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSelective Attentionconcept

    Studies disagree on whether bilingualism provides an advantage in selective attention. Some research demonstrates bilingual advantages in children's visual attention and adults' auditory attention, whereas other research finds no significant differences in young adults' visual search and selective attention performance.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

  • Disagreement on the same question

    SupportsAttention

    Whether bilingualism confers an attentional advantage is unresolved within this corpus. One study found bilinguals outperformed monolinguals on auditory selective attention (r = −0.40 for late childhood bilinguals) and attentional switching; a lifespan study found almost no advantage across tasks, with monolinguals often faster or more accurate on the Simon task.

  • Scope difference — different assays, populations, or outcomes

    Studies disagree on whether bilingualism provides an advantage in selective attention. Some research demonstrates bilingual advantages in children's visual attention and adults' auditory attention, whereas other research finds no significant differences in young adults' visual search and selective attention performance.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Two experiments comparing monolinguals with early/late childhood or early-adulthood bilinguals on TEA auditory attention
N
Experiment 1 n=60; Experiment 2 n=38 — no single primary N
Population
University of Edinburgh students fluent in English
Outcome
Auditory selective attention and attentional switching by bilingual onset

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Inspect source passages

Does learning a second language late still boost auditory attention?

These passages occur verbatim in the stored paper text. They support the points listed below; they do not verify every statement in the explanation.

60 participants in the first experiment

All 60 subjects were students at the University of Edinburgh, who understood and spoke English fluently.

19 monolinguals in the first experiment

Based on the results of the Language Ability Questionnaire (see Appendix 1 in Supplementary Material), 19 were classified as monolinguals (ML), 23 as ECB, and 18 as LCB (see Appendix 2 for a detailed list of languages spoken by each participant).
Read passages in the original paper

Key findings

Bilinguals performed better than monolinguals on auditory selective attention and attentional switching. Specifically, late childhood bilinguals excelled at selective attention, showing a moderate effect size of r = −0.40, while early childhood bilinguals excelled at switching, showing an effect size of r = −0.35. Early adulthood bilinguals also performed significantly better than monolinguals on the selective attention task.

Methodology

Researchers tested university students' auditory attention using the Test of Everyday Attention. In the first phase, they evaluated 60 participants divided into 19 monolinguals, 23 early childhood bilinguals who acquired their second language before age 4, and 18 late childhood bilinguals who acquired it between ages 4 and 15. In the second phase, they evaluated 38 participants, comparing 19 monolinguals with 19 early adulthood bilinguals who acquired their second language between ages 15 and 19.

Limitations

The study cannot prove that learning a second language causes improved attention, as it is possible that individuals with naturally stronger cognitive abilities are simply more likely to become bilingual. It also did not measure general intelligence or cognitive skills outside of the specific attention tests. Additionally, because the participants were young university students, the findings cannot automatically be generalized to older adults or clinical populations, and they did not examine adults who acquired a second language after age 19.

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.