Skip to content
PaperFren

Development

Do different bilingual environments affect children's attention?

Blom E, Boerma T, Bosma E, et al. · Frontiers in psychology · 2017

Open access · cc by · source: Europe PMC

Bilingual children outperform monolinguals in selective attention, but this advantage depends on their language proficiency and their specific sociolinguistic environment.

Study at a glance

Design
Cross-sectional — Matched comparison of monolingual Dutch and three bilingual groups on WM and attention tasks
N
N=176 · Four groups of 44 children aged 6–7, matched on age, NVIQ, SES, and gender
Population
6–7-year-old children in the Netherlands (Dutch, Frisian-Dutch, Limburgish-Dutch, Polish-Dutch)
Outcome
Working memory, selective attention, and interference suppression by language group

Structured fields used in claim comparison tables when every cited study has a complete layer.

Key findings

Bilingual children overall outperformed monolinguals on the selective attention task, an effect primarily driven by Frisian-Dutch and highly proficient Polish-Dutch children. However, no bilingual advantages were found in the working memory or interference suppression tasks. Additionally, the researchers observed that 25% of the flanker data showed a negative flanker effect, which was significantly more common among monolinguals than bilinguals.

Methodology

The researchers compared 176 children aged 6 to 7 years old divided into four groups of 44: monolingual Dutch, Frisian-Dutch, Limburgish-Dutch, and Polish-Dutch. The children completed standardized tasks measuring verbal and visuospatial working memory, selective attention, and interference suppression. The groups were carefully matched on age, non-verbal intelligence, socioeconomic status, and gender to prevent confounding variables.

Limitations

This study cannot establish a direct causal link between bilingualism and attentional advantages because of its cross-sectional design. It does not prove that all bilingual children have superior cognitive abilities, as the advantages were task-specific and absent in working memory and standard inhibition tests. Additionally, the results are limited to the specific regional and migrant languages studied in the Netherlands and may not generalize to other linguistic pairings or older age groups.

How this study connects

Role on claims

Each row is a claim on a concept or method page where this paper supports, challenges, or qualifies the statement. Roles are hand-checked — not a model guess.

  • SupportsExecutive Functionconcept

    While some evidence suggests that bilingualism and second-language proficiency provide specific cognitive advantages in attention or cognitive reserve, multiple large studies show no generalized executive control or switching advantage across the lifespan.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSelective Attentionconcept

    Bilingual children may outperform monolinguals in selective attention, though this developmental advantage is context-dependent and heavily influenced by specific sociolinguistic factors and language proficiency.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

  • SupportsSelective Attentionconcept

    Studies disagree on whether bilingualism provides an advantage in selective attention. Some research demonstrates bilingual advantages in children's visual attention and adults' auditory attention, whereas other research finds no significant differences in young adults' visual search and selective attention performance.

    Evidence for the claim as stated.

Open questions

Tensions this paper is part of

From concept pages' “where studies disagree.” Disagreement means the same question; scope means different assays, populations, or outcomes.

Discoveries this paper informs or conflicts with

Related papers in this topic

Same topic cluster — not a recommendation engine.